False Confessions and the Use of Incriminating Evidence

Tim Cole, JC Bruno Teboul, David E Zulawski, Douglas E Wicklander, Shane G Sturman

Abstract


To date, few experimental studies have looked at the factors that influence people’s willingness to confess to something they did not do.  One widely cited experiment on the topic (i.e., Kassin & Kiechel, 1996) has suggested that false confessions are easy to obtain and that the use of false incriminating evidence increases the likelihood of obtaining one.  The present research attempted to replicate Kassin and Kiechel’s (1996) work using a different experimental task.  In the present experiment, unlike Kassin and Kiechel’s (1996) study, the participants were completely certain that they were not responsible for what had happened, thereby providing a different context for testing the idea that false incriminating evidence increases the likelihood of obtaining a false confession.  The results are discussed with respect to factors that may or may not increase individuals’ willingness to offer a false admission of guilt.

Keywords


false confession, subjective awareness, incriminating evidence, interrogation techniques

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agar, J. R. (1999). The admissibility of false confession expert testimony. The Army Lawyer, August, 26-42.

Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measures of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationship (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press.

Conti, R. P. (1999). The psychology of false confessions. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 2, 14-36.

Forrest, K, D., Wadkins, T. A.., & Miller, R. L. (2002). The role of preexisting stress on false confessions: An empirical study. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 3, 23-45.

Freyd, J. J. (1996). The science of memory: Apply with caution. Traumatic StressPoints, 10, 1 & 8.

Garven, S., Wood, J.M., Malpass, R.S., & Shaw, J.S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin Preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347-359.

Gleaves, D. H., & Freyd, J. J. (1997). Questioning additional claims abut the false memory syndrome epidemic. American Psychologist, 52, 993-994.

Hoeffel, J. C. (2002). The sixth amendment’s lost clause: Unearthing compulsory process. Wisconsin Law Review, 1275-1361.

Hoffman, H. G., Granhag, P. A., Kwong See, S. T., & Loftus, E. F. (2001). Social influences on reality monitoring decisions. Memory and Cognition, 29, 394-404.

Honts, C. R. (1996). Criterion development and validity of the CQT in field application. The Journal of General Psychology, 123, 309-324.

Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., Josephs, S. (2003). Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 1-8.

Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221-233.

Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125-128.

Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187-203.

Lassiter, G. D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 204-208.

Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Weiland, P. E., & Munhall, P. J. (2002). Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 867-874.

Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Munhall, P. J., Handley, I. M., & Beers, M. J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 33, pp. 189–254). New York: Academic Press.

Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429-496.

Loftus, E. F. (1997a). Creating false memories. Scientific American, 277, 70-75.

Loftus, E. F. (1997b). Creating childhood memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 75-86.

Meares, T. L., & Harcourt, B. E. (2000). Supreme Court Review: Transparent adjudication and social science research in constitutional criminal procedure. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90, 733-798.

Nadler, J. (2002). No need to shout: Bus sweeps and the psychology of coercion. The Supreme Court Review, 153, 1-58.

Perina, A. (March/April, 2003). “I confess:” Why would an innocent person profess guilt? Psychology Today, 11-12.

Redlich, A.D., & Goodman, G.S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 141-156.

Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54, 182-203.

Smith, P. (Sep. 1, 2003). Why would they falsely confess? New York Times Upfront, 136, 11.

Weisselberg, C. D. (1998). Saving Miranda. Cornell Law Review, 84, 109-192.

Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 539-570.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/lesli.2013.4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share